Allahabad High Court
RAM CHARITTAR SINGHversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed in default due to the petitioner's non‑appearance.
Summary
The writ petition filed by Ram Charittar Singh was listed for a priority hearing, but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition in default. The court also vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. The judgment notes that any aggrieved party may file a recall application within one month. No substantive merits of the petition were considered due to the default dismissal.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for default when the petitioner fails to appear before the court
Subjects
- default dismissal
- writ petition
- vacated interim order
- recall application
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 13882 of 1981
Ram Charittar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.K. Rai, Awadhesh Kumar Singh,
R.N. Singh, S.N. Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K. Singh, Namwar Singh, S. Rai,
S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
. The matter is listed under heading "Oldest pending cases for priority
hearing".
2. List revised. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner(s).
3. The writ petition is dismissed in default.
4. Interim order, if any granted earlier, stands vacated.
5. In case, any of the party is aggrieved with this order, he is free to move
the recall application within one month from today.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
January 30, 2026
saqlain
Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…