Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LAL BACHAN AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioners Lal Bachan and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing date. The court noted the absence of any party to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted due to non-appearance of parties?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - B No. - 144 of 1983

                                    Lal Bachan And Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Other
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                        :     Shashi Nandan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                        :     S.C.

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                     HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. Matter is listed under the category "Oldest pending cases in this High
                                    Court, for priority hearing".

                                    2. None is present to press the petition even in the revised list.

                                    3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                           (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Sazia




Digitally signed by :-
SAZIA AQUIL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.