Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NIKHIDHIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Nikhidhi, filed Writ Petition No. 14540 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' for a priority hearing. On the scheduled date, no counsel or party appeared to press the petition. The Court noted the absence of any representation and, pursuant to procedural rules, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered, and the dismissal was entered on the date of the hearing, 20 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is not pursued by the petitioner on the scheduled hearing date?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - B No. - 14540 of 1981

                                    Nikhidhi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Anil Bhushan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Alok Kumar Yadav, R.R. Yadav, S.C.

                                    Court No. - 55
                                                          HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases in this High
                                    Court, for Priority Hearing'.

                                    2. None present to press the writ petition.

                                    3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                              (Arun Kumar,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Anil




Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.