Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NAND KISHOREversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14676 of 1983 in the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after the revised list was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was also discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or be represented before the Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural default
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - B No. - 14676 of 1983

                                    Nand Kishore
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C.And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : A.K.Dwivedi,      C.S.Rai,    Ravindra
                                                                      Kumar Yadav, Yogeshwar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Dhan     Prakash,    G.C.Rai,      S.C.,
                                                                      S.K.Srivastava, Santosh Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                           HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases In This
                                    High Court, For Priority Hearing'.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, even in
                                    the revised list.

                                    3. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                                              (Arun Kumar,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Ranjeet Sahu




Digitally signed by :-
RANJEET SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.