Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEO PRAYAGversusRAM PRAKASH GUPTA

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petition filed by Deo Prayag was listed for priority hearing but no party appeared to press the petition. The court noted the absence of any petitioner on the revised list and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. As a result, any interim order that had been granted was vacated. No substantive merits of the case were considered. The dismissal was entered on March 18, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear.

Subjects

  • petition dismissed
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 15420 of 1981

                                    Deo Prayag
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Ram Prakash Gupta
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                               :   R.Asthana
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                               :   W.H.Khan

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                     HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. Matter is listed under the category "Oldest pending cases in this High
                                    Court, for priority hearing".

                                    2. None is present to press the petition even in the revised list.

                                    3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                            (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Sazia




Digitally signed by :-
SAZIA AQUIL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.