Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DHANI RAMversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhani Ram, filed writ petition No. 1597 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed under the "Oldest pending cases" category for a priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the revised list. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The dismissal was pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Kshitij Shailendra on 18 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted and no party appears before the Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 1597 of 1983

                                    Dhani Ram
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : R.C. Shukla, R.S. Verma, Sankatha
                                                                       Rai, Tej Pratap Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : S.C.

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                     HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. Matter is listed under the category "Oldest pending cases in this High
                                    Court, for priority hearing".

                                    2. None is present to press the petition even in the revised list.

                                    3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                           (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Sazia




Digitally signed by :-
SAZIA AQUIL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.