Allahabad High Court
SHESHDHARversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear before the court.
Summary
The petitioner, Sheshdhar, filed writ petition No. 2153 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel and counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after revising the list, proceeded to dismiss the petition. The dismissal was on the ground of default for non-appearance.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Subjects
- default judgment
- writ petition
- dismissal
- non-appearance
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 2153 of 1979
Sheshdhar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Krishna
Kumar
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. List has been revised. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner though
learned Standing Counsel as well as Shri Arvind Kumar Srivastava,
learned counsel are present on behalf of respondents.
2. The writ petition is dismissed in default.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
March 19, 2026
Swati
Digitally signed by :-
SWATI PATHAK
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…