Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. LAKHPATIversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Smt. Lakhpati filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 218 of 1980) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The case was listed under "Oldest Pending Cases for Priority Hearing". No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The dismissal was pronounced by Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal on 19 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is not prosecuted by the petitioner?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • priority hearing
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - B No. - 218 of 1980

                                    Smt. Lakhpati
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    D.D.C.And Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :      Sankatha Rai
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :      S.C., S.N. Singh

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                        HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    This case is listed under the heading of "Oldest Pending Cases in this High
                                    Court for Priority Hearing".

                                    List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner(s) to press this writ
                                    petition.

                                    The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                              (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Amit Mishra




Digitally signed by :-
AMIT KUMAR MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.