Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SM.T GIDIYAversusA.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, T Gidiya, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further action was taken by the petitioner, and the petition remained unprosecuted. The Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the writ petition. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 2949 of 1981

                                    Sm.T Gidiya
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    A.D.C. And Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                              :    W.H. Khan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                              :    S.C.

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                     HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. The matter is listed under the category of 'oldest pending cases in this
                                    High Court, for priority hearing'.

                                    2. List revised. None appears to press the writ petition.

                                    3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                           (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    AKShukla/-




Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.