Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAGDISH AND OTHERSversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 3348 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Board of Revenue. The case was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No petitioner appeared before the court, even after the revised list was issued. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was also discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for prosecution of a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 3348 of 1982

                                    Jagdish And Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Board Of Revenue And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : G.N. Verma, Kamlesh Singh, Rateesh
                                                                      Singh, S.K. Verma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                           HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases In This
                                    High Court, For Priority Hearing'.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, even in
                                    the revised list.

                                    3. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                                              (Arun Kumar,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Ranjeet Sahu




Digitally signed by :-
RANJEET SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.