Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MST. RAJA BETIversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Mst. Raja Beti filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed under the 'Oldest Pending Cases' for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared to press the petition on the scheduled date. The Court observed that the petition remained unprosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded on May 18, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition remains unprosecuted due to non-appearance of parties?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 3434 of 1980

                                    Mst. Raja Beti
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Board Of Revenue And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : D.S.P.Singh, K.K.Mishra, K.S. Misra,
                                                                      R.R. Trivedi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C., K.P.Gupta

                                    Court No. - 55
                                                          HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases in this High
                                    Court, for Priority Hearing'.

                                    2. None present to press the writ petition.

                                    3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                              (Arun Kumar,J.)
                                    May 18, 2026
                                    Anil




Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.