Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAI SHANKER AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or be represented at the hearing. The court noted the absence of any petitioner representation even after a revised list. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was discharged. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can proceed in the absence of petitioner representation?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 3955 of 1982

                                    Jai Shanker And Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : P. Upadhyay
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Gorakh Nath Mourya, S.C., Shailesh
                                                                      Kumar Tiwari

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                           HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the caption 'Oldest Pending Cases In This
                                    High Court, For Priority Hearing'.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, even in
                                    the revised list.

                                    3. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.



                                                                                              (Arun Kumar,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Ranjeet Sahu




Digitally signed by :-
RANJEET SAHU
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.