Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GENDA LALversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Genda Lal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. No further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been in force was vacated.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition that remains unprosecuted?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - B No. - 4905 of 1982

                                    Genda Lal
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    D.D.C. And Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   H.S. Nigam
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   P. Chandra, R.K. Rathore, S.C.

                                    Court No. - 37
                                                     HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.

                                    1. The matter is listed under the category of 'oldest pending cases in this
                                    High Court, for priority hearing'.

                                    2. List revised. None appears to press the writ petition.

                                    3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.


                                                                                           (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    AKShukla/-




Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.