Allahabad High Court
BABU LAL AND ANOTHER OBJECTION FILEDversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE LUCKNOW AND OTHERS 4
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioners Babu Lal and another filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 1000034 of 2003) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the respondent State of U.P. was represented. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petition is not prosecuted and no counsel appears for the petitioners?
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural default
- vacated interim order
- dismissal for want of prosecution
Judgment
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000034 of 2003
Petitioner :- Babu Lal And Another Objection Filed
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secretary Revenue
Lucknow And Others 4
Counsel for Petitioner :- H.K.Mishra,Abhisht Saran,Govind
Saran Nigam,R.K.S.Chauhan,Rahul Kumar Kashyap
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.N.Gupta
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
1. The case is called out in revised list.
2. No-one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners,
however, learned Additional CSC for respondent - State is
present.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.8.2025
Adarsh K Singh
Digitally signed by :-
ADARSH KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…