Allahabad High Court
HARGOVINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Hargovind, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court examined the submission and found that the petition did not satisfy the requirement of being pressed or maintainable. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. The judgment further clarified that the petitioner is not granted any liberty to file another writ petition on the same cause of action.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner is pressed and maintainable.
Subjects
- writ petition
- not pressed
- dismissal
- maintainability
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 10320 of 2026
Hargovind
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Nand Kishor
Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by counsel for the
petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
3. It is made clear that no liberty has been granted to the petitioner to
file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
March 19, 2026
Pramod Tripathi
Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…