Allahabad High Court
OSAMA JAFRI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Holding
The order dated 30.03.2024 is set aside and the writ petition is allowed.
Summary
The petitioners Osama Jafri and four others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30 March 2024 passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. Both parties' counsel agreed that the controversy was identical to that already decided in Writ‑C No. 18255 of 2024. The High Court, relying on the detailed order in the earlier writ, allowed the present petition. Consequently, the order dated 30.03.2024 was set aside. The court directed that the consequences of the set‑aside order be implemented.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dated 30.03.2024 is legally valid.
- Whether the controversy in the present writ is identical to that in Writ‑C No. 18255 of 2024.
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Set Aside Order
- Allahabad High Court
- Civil Procedure
- Judicial Review
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 16129 of 2024
Osama Jafri And 4 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Imran, Syed Safdar Ali Kazmi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the parties are at consensus that the controversy
covered by the present writ petition is identical to the one involved in
Writ-C No. 18255 of 2024.
2. In view of the detailed order passed today in Writ-C No. 18255 of
2024, this writ petition is also allowed.
3. The order dated 30.03.2024 is set aside.
4. Consequences to follow.
(Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
September 23, 2026
AKShukla/-
Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…