Allahabad High Court
SMT. PRATIGYAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Smt. Pratigya, filed Writ Petition No. 17606 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was found to contain certain discrepancies, rendering it not pressed. Counsel for the petitioner acknowledged the deficiencies and suggested that the petition could be dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh petition. The Court examined the petition and concurred that it was not pressed due to the identified discrepancies. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is sufficiently pressed for adjudication
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural defect
- fresh petition
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17606 of 2026
Smt. Pratigya
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned
counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as
not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition.
In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the
aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
May 6, 2026
Sattyarth
(Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SATTYARTH ANAND
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…