Allahabad High Court
DANNA SHAHA MIYAN URS MELA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition that contained certain discrepancies. Their counsel highlighted these deficiencies and suggested that the petition be dismissed, allowing the petitioners to file a fresh petition. The Court examined the petition and agreed that it was not properly pressed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as not pressed, granting the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition that is not properly pressed due to discrepancies should be dismissed.
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural deficiency
- dismissal
- fresh petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17668 of 2026
Danna Shaha Miyan Urs Mela Management
Committee .....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Jitendra Bahadur Singh, Rajiv
Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned
counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as
not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty
to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
May 6, 2026
NS
(Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NITIN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…