Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. POOJA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Pooja Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh petition. During hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed that they did not wish to press the present petition and sought liberty to file a new one. The Court noted that the petition was not being pressed and therefore dismissed it. No substantive merits on the alleged interference or protection were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to restrain alleged interference in marital life under Article 226.
  • Whether the petition can be dismissed for not being pressed by the petitioners.

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • writ jurisdiction
  • mandamus
  • marital life
  • petition withdrawn
  • protective orders

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                           WRIT - C No. - 17707 of 2026

                                    Smt. Pooja Yadav And Another
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Awadh Bihari Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 76
                                                   HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

                                    Heard Shri Awadh Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and
                                    Shri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.

                                    Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
                                    with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to
                                    interfere, harass or cause any interference in the peaceful marital life of the
                                    petitioners and further direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to provide adequate
                                    protection to protect their life and liberty from respondent No.4.

                                    Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this petition and
                                    wants liberty to file a fresh petition.

                                    In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with
                                    the aforesaid liberty.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Ishan
                                                                                     (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ISHAN JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.