Allahabad High Court
SIMRAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioners, Simran Sharma and another, filed a writ petition alleging that their marriage was recognized by their parents and that there was no danger to their lives. Their counsel submitted that the petition was not being pressed and requested its dismissal. The respondents, the State of U.P. and three others, were represented by counsel C.S.C. The court examined whether the petition was pressed and whether any threat to the petitioners' life existed. Finding that the petition was indeed not pressed and no danger was shown, the court dismissed the writ petition. The dismissal was entered on May 7, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is pressed and should proceed
- Whether there is any apprehension of danger to the petitioners' life
Subjects
- writ petition
- not pressed
- marriage recognition
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17991 of 2026
Simran Sharma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parents of the
petitioners are agreed and recognized the marriage of the petitioners and
due to that there is no apprehension of danger to the life of the petitioners.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press
this petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
May 7, 2026
A.
Digitally signed by :-
AFAQ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…