Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. THRU MANAGERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38120 of 2014) against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition was to be heard before a bench of Hon'ble Justices Saral Srivastava and Garima Prashad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been in force. The dismissal was recorded on 6 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or present counsel for prosecution of a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated
  • insurance
  • state

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                           WRIT - C No. - 38120 of 2014

                                    United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Thru Manager
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                :   Nagendra Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                :   C.S.C., Sunil Kumar

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                       HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

                                    List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press
                                    the petition.

                                    Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Sattyarth
                                                                    (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SATTYARTH ANAND
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.