Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TAYRA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Tayra Khatoon and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17 February 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, but the petitioners did not. The Court observed that the petition remained unprosecuted and consequently dismissed it. The interim order, if any, was vacated, and the petition was closed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear for hearing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 38721 of 2025

                                    Tayra Khatoon And Another
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Yashodanand Shukla
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 76
                                                     HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

                                    Even in the revised list none has appeared for the petitioners. However
                                    learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for the State is present.

                                    On 17.2.2026 and 22.4.2026 also none was present for the petitioners
                                    even in the revised list.

                                    The present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                                    (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    A.




Digitally signed by :-
AFAQ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.