Allahabad High Court
TEJ PRATAP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR
Holding
The Court directs the respondent to decide the pending case within three months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order.
Summary
Petitioner Tej Pratap Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a computerized case (Hariram v. Sri Ram, No. T201605310203568 of 2007) pending under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioner alleged that the case had been pending since 2007 and was being deliberately delayed by the opposite parties. The Court examined the petition and noted the undue delay in adjudicating the matter. It directed the respondent to pass an appropriate order after hearing the parties, within three months of the certified copy of the order. The direction aims to ensure timely disposal of the pending case in accordance with law.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the pending case under Section 34 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 within a stipulated time.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- writ petition
- judicial delay
- Section 34
- U.P. Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act
- pending case
- direction to decide
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39964 of 2026
Tej Pratap Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Srivastava, Subedar
Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel
for the respondents State. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi has accepted
notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the
respondent no.2 to decide the Computerized Case No.T201605310203568
of 2007 (Hariram Vs. Sri Ram) under Section 34 of the U.P.Z.A.& L.R.
Act, 1950, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the proceeding
of the aforesaid case under Section 34 of the Act is pending consideration
before the respondent no.2 since the year 2007 and the matter is being
lingered on at the behest of the opposite parties.
4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a
direction upon the respondent no.2 to decide the pending case, as noticed
above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after
affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period
of three months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this
order.
(Arun Kumar,J.)
October 1, 2026
Anil
Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…