Allahabad High Court
BRIJENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioners Brijendra Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that subsequent developments had rendered the petition ineffective. The court examined the claim of infructuosity. Finding that the petition no longer had any operative purpose, the court dismissed it as infructuous. No substantive merits of the original relief were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to subsequent developments
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 4096 of 2010
Brijendra Singh And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshu Chaudhary, Anupam
Kulshreshtha
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Along with :
1. Writ - C No. 24295 of 2009:
Brijendra Singh and another
Versus
State of U.P. Thru Principal Secy R and R and others
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of
subsequent developments, the present writ petition has been rendered
infructuous.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Kshitij Shailendra,J.)
March 18, 2026
Prashant D.
Digitally signed by :-
PRASHANT DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…