Allahabad High Court
SWARNA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Summary
A writ petition (Writ‑C No. 414 of 2026) was filed by Swarna Sharma and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners’ counsel did not appear at the hearing. Counsel for respondent No. 4, Ramesh Kumar Pandey, and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State were present. In the interest of justice, the matter was listed as a fresh case. The court adjourned the hearing to 21 May 2026 at 2.00 p.m.
Subjects
- procedural
- writ
- adjournment
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 414 of 2026
Swarna Sharma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Yadav, Rahul Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ramesh Kumar Panday,
Sandeep Maurya
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Even in the revised list none has appeared for the petitioners. However,
Sri Ramesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 as
well as Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel
for the State are present.
In the interest of justice, put up this case on 21.5.2026 as fresh at 2.00
P.M.
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
May 13, 2026
A.
Digitally signed by :-
AFAQ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…