Allahabad High Court
RAM CHANDRAversusCOMMISSIONER BAREILLY DIVISION AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Ram Chandra, filed writ petition No. 53317 of 2000 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed as "likely to be infructuous" and no further case was called out. The Court observed that, by the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was no longer maintainable. The interim order previously granted was vacated, but the parties were permitted to move an application for recall if the matter still survived.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the lapse of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- procedural lapse
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 53317 of 2000
Ram Chandra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Commissioner Bareilly Division And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : H.C.Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
1. This case is listed under the heading of "likely to be infructuous".
2. Case called out. None appears.
3. It appears that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become
infructuous.
4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. However, the parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application
for recall of this order in case the matter still survives.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
March 24, 2026
Abhishek Gupta
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…