Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

U.P.S.R.T.C. THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER JHANSIversusBANNE KHAN AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.

Summary

The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. Over time, the petition became moot as the circumstances that gave rise to it ceased to exist. The Court observed that the petition was now infructuous due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of being infructuous. The interim order previously granted was vacated, but the parties were allowed to move an application for recall if any issue still persisted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition filed by UPSRTC remains maintainable or has become infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • procedural
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 53412 of 2000

                                    U.P.S.R.T.C. Through Its Regional Manager Jhansi
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Banne Khan And Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Nishant Mehrotra, R.A.Gaur, Sheo
                                                                      Ram Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C, G.K.Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                       HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the heading of "likely to be infructuous".

                                    2. Case called out. None appears.

                                    3. It appears that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become
                                    infructuous.

                                    4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. However, the parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application
                                    for recall of this order in case the matter still survives.



                                                                                            (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    March 24, 2026
                                    Abhishek Gupta




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.