Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NAQLI RAMversusADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Naqli Ram, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Over the course of the proceedings, a substantial lapse of time occurred. The Court examined whether the petition remained viable after this delay. It held that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed and any interim orders were vacated, though the parties may apply for recall if the matter still survives.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a substantial lapse of time on the viability of a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • delay

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 54019 of 2000

                                    Naqli Ram
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Addl. Commissioner Judicial And Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : P.K.S.Paliwal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Anuj Kumar, C.S.C., Krishan Mohan

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                       HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the heading of "likely to be infructuous".

                                    2. Case called out. None appears.

                                    3. It appears that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become
                                    infructuous.

                                    4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. However, the parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application
                                    for recall of this order in case the matter still survives.



                                                                                            (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    March 24, 2026
                                    Abhishek Gupta




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.