Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

STATE OF U.P.THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGG.P.W.D.N.S.HIGHWAY DIV.-IversusTHE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY P.W.ACT AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the passage of time had rendered the relief sought unavailable.

Summary

The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Executive Engineering Department of the P.W.D. (N.S.) Highway Division, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but no specific relief or facts were detailed in the judgment. The Court observed that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the relief sought could no longer be granted. The interim order previously granted was vacated, and the parties were permitted to move an application for recall if the matter still survived.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • lapse of time
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 55015 of 2000


                                    State Of U.P.Through Executive
                                    Engg.P.W.D.N.S.Highway Div.-I                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    The Controlling Authority P.W.Act And Another
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                         :    S.C.
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                         :    C.S.C, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                       HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    1. This case is listed under the heading of "likely to be infructuous".

                                    2. Case called out. None appears.

                                    3. It appears that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become
                                    infructuous.

                                    4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. However, the parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application
                                    for recall of this order in case the matter still survives.



                                                                                            (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    March 25, 2026
                                    Abhishek Gupta




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.