Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUMER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the writ petition was not pressed and therefore dismissed it.

Summary

The petitioner, Sumer Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted this prayer and ordered the dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The judgment further clarified that the petitioner is not granted any liberty to file another petition on the same cause of action. No substantive merits of the petition were examined, and the order was pronounced on 19 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is pressed and can be dismissed as not pressed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • not pressed
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 5806 of 2026

                                    Sumer Singh
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Amit Kumar Malviya, Manoj Pathak
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 6
                                                        HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the
                                    petitioner to dismiss the present petition as not pressed.

                                    2. Prayer is allowed.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

                                    4. It is made clear that no liberty whatsoever has been granted to the
                                    petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.



                                                                                            (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Swati




Digitally signed by :-
SWATI PATHAK
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.