Allahabad High Court
SHOBHARAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
Petitioners Shobharam and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and five other respondents. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose this prayer. The Court, after noting the lack of opposition and the petitioners' own request, held that the petition was not pressed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is pressed and should be entertained
Subjects
- writ petition
- press
- dismissal
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 6375 of 2026
Shobharam And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupama Parashar, Satendra Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. After some arguments, prayer has been made by learned counsel for the
petitioners to dismiss the present petition as not press.
2. This prayer has not been opposed by learned Standing Counsel.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
February 17, 2026
Mini
Digitally signed by :-
MINI KANAUJIYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…