Allahabad High Court
SANDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner challenged an order dated 12 January 2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Kannauj. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the writ petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent counsel, including the Standing Counsel and other learned counsel, did not oppose this prayer. The court considered the lack of opposition and the petitioner's request. Consequently, the court allowed the prayer and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. The dismissal effectively upholds the original administrative order.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is pressed and maintainable for adjudication
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- administrative order
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 6706 of 2026
Sandeep Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hanuman Kinkar, Ramkinkar
Upadhyay
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. The order dated 12.01.2026 passed by the respondent no.2-Additional
Commissioner (Administration), Kannauj is under challenge in the present
writ petition.
2. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by counsel for the
petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed.
3. This prayer has not been opposed by learned Standing Counsel, Sri
Hanuman Kinkar, Sri Ramkinkar Upadhyay and Sri Saurabh Kumar,
learned counsel for the respondent & caveator.
4. Prayer made is allowed.
5. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
March 19, 2026
Pramod Tripathi
Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…