Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GHANSHYAM RAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The court must direct the respondent to decide the pending case promptly, in accordance with law, and avoid unnecessary adjournments.

Summary

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Ray, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent, the State of U.P., to decide Case No. 10101 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202505440110101) without further delay. The petitioner contended that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final decision had been rendered. The court examined the petition and the record, noting the delay in adjudication. It held that the respondent must decide the pending case strictly in accordance with law and refrain from unnecessary adjournments unless a legal impediment exists. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of with an order directing the concerned court to dispose of the case expeditiously.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should issue a direction to the respondent to decide the pending case expeditiously and limit adjournments

Subjects

  • delay in justice
  • writ petition
  • expeditious disposal
  • adjournment
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 9078 of 2026

                                    Ghanshyam Ray
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Amit Pratap Singh, Sangeeta Gupta
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 6
                                                         HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing
                                    Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record.

                                    2. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to
                                    direct the respondent no.2 to decide Case No.10101 of 2025
                                    (Computerized Case No.T202505440110101 expeditiously.

                                    3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable
                                    time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been
                                    taken in the matter.

                                    5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is
                                    disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid
                                    case strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary
                                    adjournment unless there is no legal impediment.


                                                                                          (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Pramod Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.