Allahabad High Court
UMESH CHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Umesh Chandra Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to pursue an alternative legal remedy and requested that the writ petition be treated as withdrawn. The Court considered the petitioner's request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to seek other remedies. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- alternative remedy
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 916 of 2026
Umesh Chandra Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ten Singh
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition
may be dismissed as withdrawn as the petitioner wants to avail other
remedy available in law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
(Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
May 7, 2026
Kuldeep
Digitally signed by :-
KULDEEP SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…