Allahabad High Court
GYAN PRAKASH YADAVversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Gyan Prakash Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Anurag Yadav, was later engaged as subsequent counsel but reportedly had no instructions. No petitioner appeared before the court on the revised list to pursue the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT TAX No. - 222 of 2024
Gyan Prakash Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Yadav, Imran Ali, Murtuza Ali
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
Mr. Murtuza Ali, Advocate states that Mr. Anurag Yadav has been engaged
as a subsequent counsel by the petitioner and he has no instructions in the
matter.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner(s) to press this writ
petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
May 6, 2026
Rahul Dwivedi/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…