High Court of Gujarat
CHANDRIKABEN W/O JAYESHBHAI SOLANKI D/O NARSIBHAI HARJIBHAI RATHODversusJAYESHBHAI MANJIBHAI SOLANKI
- Disposal
- 53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Holding
The delay of 308 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.
Summary
The wife (applicant) filed a condonation of delay application seeking permission to file an appeal 308 days after the prescribed period. The husband (respondent) indicated that he would pay the permanent alimony within a month. The court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons for the delay. Finding that the applicants had established sufficient cause, the judges held that the delay should be condoned. Consequently, the application for condonation was allowed, permitting the appeal to proceed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 308 days in preferring an appeal can be condoned under the applicable procedural law
Subjects
condonation of delaycivil procedureappealalimonyfamily law
Judgment
C/CA/2856/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2856 of
2026
In F/FIRST APPEAL/19504/2026
==========================================================
CHANDRIKABEN W/O JAYESHBHAI SOLANKI D/O NARSIBHAI HARJIBHAI
RATHOD
Versus
JAYESHBHAI MANJIBHAI SOLANKI
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CHINTAN M ADESHARA(12794) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR PUNIT R DAVE(11920) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS KIRAN R UDASI(12127) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.DIPAK B PATEL(3744) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 09/07/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. Learned advocate Mr.Dipak B.Patel appearing for the respondent
husband, upon instructions, states that within one month the
amount of permanent alimony will be honoured to the appellant
wife.
2. By this application, the applicants have prayed for condonation of
delay of 308 days in preferring captioned appeal.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and
considering the averments made in the application, the applicants
have established sufficient cause and therefore, delay as mentioned
Page 1 of 2
C/CA/2856/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
in the delay condonation application, in preferring the captioned
appeal deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.
4. Accordingly, the present application is allowed in above terms.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
(R. T. VACHHANI, J)
H.M. PATHAN
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: HABIBULLAKHAN MOHAMMADKHAN PATHAN(HC00167), GOV, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 16:57:09
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search