Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

BONAIRE HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. OWNER OF SWISSCO PEARL (IMO 9704257)versusALPHARD MARITIME LTD. THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY GANESH NABAR

Disposal
33-CA DISPOSED OF

Holding

The suit is allowed and decreed in accordance with the Resolution Agreement, and all pending applications are disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

Alphard Maritime Ltd. filed an admiralty suit against Ocean Opal and other defendants. The parties later executed a Resolution Agreement on 5 February 2026 settling all disputes. The plaintiff sought a consent decree based on that agreement and asked the court to declare various pending OJCA applications infructuous, vacate arrest orders on vessels, and direct the Deendayal Port Authority to release the arrested vessel Swissco Pearl. The court examined the written, signed agreement and found the disputes resolved. It allowed the suit, recorded the agreement, decreed the suit in accordance with it, vacated the arrest orders, directed authorities to act on the order, and disposed of all pending applications without costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the suit can be decreed in terms of the parties' Resolution Agreement
  • Whether pending OJCA applications become infructuous upon settlement
  • Whether the court may vacate the arrest orders on the vessels of Defendants 1‑4 and Defendant 5
  • Whether the court can direct the Deendayal Port Authority to release the arrested vessel

Legislation cited

Subjects

Consent decreeResolution agreementAdmiralty suitArrest of vesselCode of Civil ProcedureOrder VII Rule 11Maritime disputeCivil applications

Judgment

      C/AS/3/2025                             ORDER DATED: 17/02/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                    R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025

                               With
       CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
 CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR VACATING INTERIM RELIEF) NO. 2 of
                               2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
    CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 6 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
        CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR ORDERS) NO. 8 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
        CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR ORDERS) NO. 9 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
       CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR ORDERS) NO. 11 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
   CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) (FOR VACATING STAY) NO. 12 of 2025
                 In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
                               With
               R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4314 of 2025
                                 In
                   R/ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 3 of 2025
==========================================================
   ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
                           Versus
             OCEAN OPAL (IMO 9626493) & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. KEYUR GANDHI, NISARG DESAI, PRAVALIKHA BATTHINI, LD
ADVOCATES on behalf of GANDHI LAW ASSOCIATES(12275) for the
Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3,4
MR. PARTH SALUJA on behalf of MR JEET B KARIA(11991) for the
Defendant(s) No. 5
MR. ROHAN LAVKUMAR,MR ADITYA DAVE, MR NISARG TRIVEDI, LD
ADVOCATES on behalf of NANAVATI ASSOCIATES(1375) for the Plaintiff(s)
No. 1
==========================================================


                               Page 1 of 4
      C/AS/3/2025                              ORDER DATED: 17/02/2026




 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA

                           Date : 17/02/2026

                            ORAL ORDER


1.   The Plainti     has   led the present application along with

the original Resolution Agreement dated 5 th February 2026

seeking the following reliefs in relation to the present Suit:

     A.   This Hon’ble Court be pleased to take the
     Resolution Agreement dated 5 th February 2026
     [Annexure ‘A’] on record and pass a Consent Decree in
     the present Suit in terms of the Resolution Agreement
     dated 5th February 2026.

     B.    This Hon’ble Court further be pleased to dispose of
     the following OJCAs referred to in para 8 of the present
     A+idavit as infructuous:
           a. OJCA NO. 1 of 2025 .led by Plainti+ for the
              sale of the Defendant No. 5.
              b. OJCA NO. 2 of 2025 .led by Underwater
                 Services Company Ltd. for vacating the Order of
                 Arrest dated 11th March 2025
              c. OJCA NO. 6 of 2025 .led by Saraswat Co-
                 operative Bank Ltd. seeking intervention in the
                 present Suit.
              d. OJCA NO. 8 of 2025 .led by Defendant No. 1, 3
                 and 4 seeking Condonation of Delay in .ling in
                 their Written Statement.
              e. OJCA NO. 9 of 2025 .led by Defendant Nos. 1
                 to 4 under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of
                 Civil Procedure, 1908.
              f. OJCA NO. 11 of 2025 .led by Defendant No. 5
                 under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil
                 Procedure, 1908.



                               Page 2 of 4
     C/AS/3/2025                            ORDER DATED: 17/02/2026




             g. OJCA NO. 12 of 2025 .led by Defendant No. 5
                for vacating Arrest of the Defendant No. 5
             h. OJCA NO. 4314 of 2025 .led by Defendant No.
                5 seeking Condonation of Delay in .ling in its
                Written Statement.
     D.   This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue necessary
     directions to the Deendayal Port Authority for vacating
     the arrest of Defendant No. 5 vessel, namely Swissco
     Pearl (IMO: 9704257).

     E.  Any other and further relief this Hon’ble Court
     deems .t in the interest of justice and equity.’


2.   Heard Learned Advocates for the respective parties and

perused the original Resolution Agreement dated 5 th February

2026. The Learned Advocates jointly submit that disputes

between the parties are now settled in terms of the Resolution

Agreement. Resultantly, the Plainti        prays that a Consent

Decree be passed in the present suit in terms of the

Resolution Agreement dated 5 th February 2026 [Annexure A at

pg. 8 of the Civil Application]. The Advocates for the

Defendants also join in that request.



3.   The Resolution Agreement dated 5th February 2026

 nally settles all disputes arising out of the present Suit. The

said Agreement is in writing and duly signed by the parties.




                             Page 3 of 4
         C/AS/3/2025                                                   ORDER DATED: 17/02/2026




4.       In view of the above, following order has been passed:

         a.     The present Suit is allowed.

         b.     The        original         Resolution            Agreement              dated         5 th

                February 2026 is taken on record.

         c.     The suit is decreed in terms of the Resolution

                Agreement dated 5th February 2026 [Annexure A to

                the present Application].

         d.     Decree to be drawn up accordingly.

         e.     The undertaking dated 12th March 2025 and 17th

                March 2025 of the owners of the Defendant Nos. 1-4

                vessels, and the Order of Arrest of Defendant No. 5

                Vessel (Swissco Pearl, IMO: 9704257) dated 11 th

                March 2025 are vacated.

         f.     All concerned authorities, including the Deendayal

                Port Authority (in respect of Defendant No.5), to act

                on an authenticated copy of the present Order.

         g.     In view of the above, all civil applications pending in

                the present suit are disposed of accordingly.

         h.     No order as to costs.

         i.     Direct service today is permitted.



                                                                             (NIRAL R. MEHTA,J)
NIHAL PATEL
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: NIHAL PATEL(HC02355), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 17/02/2026 17:43:40

                                                Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Consent decree"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.