Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

GIRISHKUMAR SHIVANDAS TRIKMANIversusBHARATBHAI ARJANBHAI FALDU PROPRIETOR

Disposal
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH

Holding

The appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Girishkumar Shivandas Trikmani filed three criminal appeals (Nos. 318, 110 and 111 of 2009) against Bharatbhai Arjanbhai Faldu Proprietor and others. The appellant was represented by Mr. M.R. Bukhari, while the respondents' counsel, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli and Mr. Yuvraj Brahmbhatt, did not appear even on the second call and made no request for adjournment. The court was required to consider whether the proceedings could continue in the absence of the respondents. The judge held that, under procedural law, a case may be dismissed when there is a want of prosecution and no party seeks a stay or adjournment. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when the respondents fail to appear and no adjournment is sought?

Subjects

want of prosecutiondismissalcriminal appealprocedural defaultnon-appearance

Judgment

         R/CR.A/318/2009                                                              ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 318 of 2009

                                             With
                               R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 110 of 2009
                                             With
                               R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 111 of 2009
==========================================================
                     GIRISHKUMAR SHIVANDAS TRIKMANI
                                  Versus
               BHARATBHAI ARJANBHAI FALDU PROPRIETOR & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MR BUKHARI(6919) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
BAILABLE WARRANT SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                 Date : 18/03/2026

                                                   ORAL ORDER


                      None present even in the second call, nor any

request for adjournment is made.



                      In view of the same, the matters are dismissed for
want of prosecution.


                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/03/2026 17:12:42




                                                        Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "want of prosecution"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.