Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SUMIT KALURAM RASTOGIversusSANJAY VASANTLAL JARIWALA

Disposal
97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Holding

The appeal is to be transferred to the Sessions Court as it falls within the victim's statutory right of appeal under CrPC Section 372 and BNSS Section 413.

Summary

The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Cr. Misc. Apps. 12753/2019 & 12908/2019, 23‑12‑2025) and the Supreme Court judgment in M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran (2025 INSC 804), held that a complainant (victim) has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of CrPC Section 372 and BNSS Section 413 to the Sessions Court. Consequently, the High Court did not examine the merits but ordered the transfer of the appeal to the appropriate Sessions Court, directing the registry to send the complete record. The court emphasized that the lower appellate court must dispose of the matter expeditiously. The order thus disposes of the appeal by directing its transfer.

Issues considered

  • The complainant's right to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act pursuant to the proviso of CrPC Section 372 and BNSS Section 413
  • Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or must transfer it to the Sessions Court

Legislation cited

Subjects

Acquittal appealSection 138 NI ActVictim's right to appealTransfer of appealSessions Court jurisdictionCrPC Section 372BNSS Section 413Criminal procedure

Judgment

     R/CR.A/1129/2023                                     ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 1129 of 2023

==========================================================
                             SUMIT KALURAM RASTOGI
                                      Versus
                        SANJAY VASANTLAL JARIWALA & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JAYDEVSINH CHUDASAMA(13128) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR PREM D DAVE(10958) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
BAILABLE WARRANT NOT RECEIVED BACK for the
Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
MS ASMITA PATEL, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
RULE SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                 Date : 11/02/2026

                                  ORAL ORDER


1.             This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred

to as `the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of the

Bharatiya        Nagrik       Suraksha         Sanhita,    2023       (hereinafter

referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against

the judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial

Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the

respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as

the `NI Act’ for short).



2.             Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned

APP     has     submitted       that    this     matter   is   required       to    be



                                       Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.A/1129/2023                                           ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court

passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with

Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.



3.               Before entering into the merits of this case, this

Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered

by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s

State      of    Gujarat         &    Anr.       being    Criminal       Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of   the        Hon’ble        Supreme          Court,   more      particularly,          the

judgment         in     the     matter     of     M/s    Celestium      Financial         V/s
A.Gyanasekaran                etc.   reported       in   2025      INSC       804,        has

observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint

under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a

specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the

Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.

Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which

are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a

direction       to    transfer       the    said     application/appeal(s)        to      the

concerned Sessions Court.


4.               In view of the above, learned advocate for the

petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned



                                           Page 2 of 3
           R/CR.A/1129/2023                                                                 ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




   Sessions Court.


   5.                     In      view          of      the        said         request,            this        appeal            is

   disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the

   appeal            to        the        concerned               Sessions              Court.            After          it       is

   transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be

   treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of

   the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly
   and issue notice to the parties. The Registry is directed to

   transfer the entire record of the case, including the certified

   copies of the order impugned and record & proceedings, if

   lying with this Court, to the concerned lower Appellate Court,

   forthwith.


   6.                     Considering that the matter has been pending for

   considerable                time,          the        learned            lower          Appellate              Court           is
   required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as

   expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that this Court has

   not gone into the merits of the matter at this stage.



                                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
   SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/02/2026 17:20:46




                                                             Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Acquittal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.