Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

RAKESH RATILAL PATELversusDINESHKUMAR KANUBHAI DESAI

Disposal
97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Holding

The appeal is to be transferred to the concerned Sessions Court and treated as an appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code/Section 413 of the BNSS.

Summary

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court noted a recent decision that a victim in a Section 138 complaint has a specific right to appeal to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 413 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Accordingly, the Court declined to consider the merits and ordered the appeal to be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court. The transfer includes the entire case record and must be treated as an appeal under the said provisions. The Court also directed the lower appellate court to dispose of the matter expeditiously, preferably within two years.

Issues considered

  • The appropriate forum for an appeal against an acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 413 of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Acquittal appealSection 138 NI ActTransfer of appealVictim's right to appealCode of Criminal ProcedureBharatiya Nagrik Suraksha SanhitaSessions Court

Judgment

     R/CR.A/1262/2017                                  ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 1262 of 2017

==========================================================
                         RAKESH RATILAL PATEL
                                Versus
                   DINESHKUMAR KANUBHAI DESAI & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DHRUV K DAVE(6928) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR NILESH A PANDYA(549) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                              Date : 16/04/2026

                               ORAL ORDER


1.             This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred

to as `the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of the

Bharatiya        Nagrik     Suraksha        Sanhita,    2023       (hereinafter

referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against

the judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial

Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the

respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as

the `NI Act’ for short).



2.             Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned

APP     has     submitted    that    this     matter   is   required       to    be

transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court



                                    Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.A/1262/2017                                           ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with

Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.



3.               Before entering into the merits of this case, this

Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered

by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s

State      of    Gujarat         &    Anr.       being    Criminal       Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of   the        Hon’ble        Supreme          Court,   more      particularly,          the

judgment         in     the     matter     of     M/s    Celestium      Financial         V/s
A.Gyanasekaran                etc.   reported       in   2025      INSC       804,        has

observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint

under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a

specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the
Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.

Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which

are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a

direction       to    transfer       the    said     application/appeal(s)        to      the

concerned Sessions Court.


4.               In view of the above, learned advocate for the

petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned

Sessions Court.



                                           Page 2 of 3
         R/CR.A/1262/2017                                                               ORDER DATED: 16/04/2026




 5.                    In      view         of      the        said        request,            this        appeal           is

 disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the

 appeal           to        the        concerned              Sessions              Court.           After          it      is

 transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be

 treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of

 the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly

 and issue notice to the parties. The Registry is directed to

 transfer the entire record of the case, including the certified

 copies of the order impugned and record & proceedings, if

 lying with this Court, to the concerned lower Appellate Court,

 forthwith.


 6.                    Considering that the matter has been pending for

 considerable               time,         the        learned            lower         Appellate              Court          is

 required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as
 expeditiously as possible, but preferably within a period of

 two years from the date of receipt of this order. It is

 clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the

 matter at this stage.


                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
 M.H. DAVE/94

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/04/2026 15:23:21




                                                         Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Acquittal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.