FRIENDS OF WOMEN WORLD BANKING INDIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The appeals must be transferred to the Sessions Court as the complainant‑victim’s right of appeal is governed by the proviso of Section 372 of the CrPC and Section 413 of the BNSS.
Summary
The High Court of Gujarat disposed of two acquittal appeals filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against a trial court order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to appeal to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 of the CrPC (or Section 413 of the BNSS). Accordingly, the Court directed that the pending appeals be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court for further hearing, without addressing the merits of the case. The order also instructed the Registry to transfer the complete case record and urged the lower appellate court to dispose of the matters expeditiously, preferably within two years.
Issues considered
- The jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain an appeal under Section 378 CrPC/Section 419 BNSS against an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act.
- Whether the appeal must be transferred to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC/Section 413 BNSS.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973s. 372, s. 378
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881s. 138
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.A/191/2015 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 191 of 2015
With
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 192 of 2015
==========================================================
FRIENDS OF WOMEN WORLD BANKING INDIA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KH BAXI(150) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR MANISH M KAUSHIK(5048) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
MS MEGHA CHITALIYA, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 13/04/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. These are the acquittal appeals filed under Section
378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter
referred to as `the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of
the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against
the judgment/s and order/s impugned passed by the learned
trial Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted
the respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to
as the `NI Act’ for short).
2. Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned
APP has submitted that these matters are required to be
transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court
Page 1 of 3
R/CR.A/191/2015 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2026
passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with
Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.
3. Before entering into the merits of this case, this
Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered
by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s
State of Gujarat & Anr. being Criminal Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, more particularly, the
judgment in the matter of M/s Celestium Financial V/s
A.Gyanasekaran etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, has
observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint
under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a
specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the
Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is
immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.
Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which
are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a
direction to transfer the said application/appeal(s) to the
concerned Sessions Court.
4. In view of the above, learned advocate for the
petitioner requested to transfer the appeals to the concerned
Sessions Court.
Page 2 of 3
R/CR.A/191/2015 ORDER DATED: 13/04/2026
5. In view of the said request, these appeals are
disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the
appeals to the concerned Sessions Court. After it is
transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be
treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of
the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly
and issue notice to the parties. The Registry is directed to
transfer the entire record of the case, including the certified
copies of the order/s impugned and record & proceedings, if
lying with this Court, to the concerned lower Appellate Court,
forthwith.
6. Considering that the matters have been pending
for considerable time, the learned lower Appellate Court is
required to make endeavour to dispose of the matters as
expeditiously as possible, but preferably within a period of
two years from the date of receipt of this order. It is
clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the
matters at this stage.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE/87
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/04/2026 14:58:15
Page 3 of 3
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.