JIGAR JITENDRA SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

     R/CR.A/2425/2022                                  ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 2425 of 2022

==========================================================
                            JIGAR JITENDRA SHAH
                                    Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DHARMESH V SHAH(1050) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR. D P SHUKLA(6403) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MS. SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                              Date : 04/05/2026

                               ORAL ORDER


1.             This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred

to as ‘the Code’          for short) / under Section 419 of the

Bharatiya        Nagrik     Suraksha        Sanhita,    2023       (hereinafter

referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against

the judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial

Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the

respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as

the ‘NI Act’ for short).



2.             Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned

APP     has     submitted    that    this     matter   is   required       to    be

transferred in view of the recent                 decision of this Court



                                    Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.A/2425/2022                                           ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026




passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with

Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.



3.               Before entering into the merits of this case, this

Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered

by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s

State      of    Gujarat         &    Anr.       being   Criminal        Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of   the        Hon’ble        Supreme          Court,   more      particularly,          the

judgment         in     the     matter     of    M/s Celestium Financial V/s
A.Gyanasekaran                etc.   reported       in   2025      INSC       804,        has

observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint

under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a

specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the

Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.

Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which

are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a

direction       to    transfer       the    said     application/appeal(s)        to      the

concerned Sessions Court.


4.               In view of the above, learned advocate for the

petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned

Sessions Court.



                                           Page 2 of 3
         R/CR.A/2425/2022                                                   ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026




  5.                  In     view      of     the      said       request,         this      appeal        is

  disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the

  appeal         to        the     concerned           Sessions          Court.         After        it    is

  transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be

  treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of

  the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly.

  The Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the

  case, including the certified copies of the order impugned and

  record        &     proceedings,            if    lying        with     this      Court,        to      the

  concerned lower Appellate Court, forthwith.


  6.                  Considering that the matter has been pending for

  considerable             time,      the      learned           lower     Appellate          Court        is

  required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as

  expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that this Court has

  not gone into the merits of the matter at this stage.




                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
  ADITYA SINGH


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ADITYA SINGH(HC02376), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 04/05/2026 15:12:37




                                                   Page 3 of 3