SOBHAN ARYANFAR S/O ABDUL HAMIDversusUNION OF INDIA
- Disposal
- 56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE
Holding
The appeal is disposed of as not pressed, and the appellant may file a fresh bail application later, to be decided independently by the trial court.
Summary
The appellant, Sobhan Aryanfar, filed a regular bail appeal after the filing of a chargesheet. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant withdrew the appeal and sought permission to file a fresh bail application before the trial court if there is a change in factual circumstances. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, stating that the appeal stands disposed of as not pressed. The court directed that any future bail application be decided independently by the trial court, without being bound by its earlier order dated 28-10-2025. No merits of the bail application were examined by the High Court.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal for regular bail after a chargesheet can be withdrawn by the appellant.
- Whether the appellant may file a fresh bail application before the trial court upon a change in factual circumstances.
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.A/3127/2025 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO.
3127 of 2025
==========================================================
SOBHAN ARYANFAR S/O ABDUL HAMID
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
AADITYA D BHATT(8580) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
CHANDNI S JOSHI(9490) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR ANKIT SHAH(6371) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
MR L B DABHI, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 25/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Aaditya Bhatt
with Ms. Chandni Joshi, Mr. Ankit Shah with Mr. Sundeep
Sadawarte and Mr. Arun Dev and Ms. Zeel Raval and Mr.
L.B. Dabhi appearing for the respective parties.
2. After hearing some time, Mr. Bhatt, learned counsel,
upon instructions, does not press this appeal and seeks
permission to )le fresh application for bail before the trial
court as and when there would be a change in fact
situation.
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.A/3127/2025 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026
3. In such circumstances, with the aforesaid liberty, the
present appeal stands disposed of as not pressed.
4. As and when fresh bail application in a change in fact
situation is )led, learned trial court, without being
in-uenced by its earlier order dated 28.10.2025 passed in
Criminal Misc. Application No.64 of 2025, shall decide the
same independently on its own merits in accordance with
law.
It is clari)ed that, this Court has not examined the
merits of the case.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
(R. T. VACHHANI, J)
P.S. JOSHI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/03/2026 16:02:24
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.