Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

DEEPAK ENTERPRISE THRO DIPINBHAI GUNVANTBHAI PATELversusALPESH STEEL THRO ALPESHBHAI J. PATEL

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Deepak Enterprise, through Dipinbhai Gunvantbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal (No. 845 of 2023) against Alpes​h Steel and its partners. The matter was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but no party appeared even on the second call and no request for adjournment was made. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the appeal. Consequently, the judge dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive issues were examined or decided.

Subjects

criminal appealdismissalwant of prosecutionprocedural default

Judgment

       R/CR.MA/5944/2023                                                                  ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 5944 of
                            2023

                                   In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL/845/2023

                                             With
                               R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 845 of 2023
==========================================================
        DEEPAK ENTERPRISE THRO DIPINBHAI GUNVANTBHAI PATEL
                               Versus
            ALPESH STEEL THRO ALPESHBHAI J. PATEL & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
TATVDEEP J JANI(7227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MAHESHB BARIYA(2234) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR RAVINDRA P PATEL(5276) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                  Date : 08/01/2026

                                                    ORAL ORDER


                      None present even in the second call nor any

request for adjournment is made.

                      In view of the same, this matter is dismissed for

want of prosecution.


                                                                                       (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 17:44:51




                                                          Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "criminal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.