Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

HARDEVSINH BALBHADRASINH JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Holding

The appeal must be transferred to the Sessions Court as it falls under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 413 of the BNSS.

Summary

The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a victim‑complainant has a specific right to appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code and Section 413 of the BNSS to the Sessions Court. Consequently, the Court declined to consider the merits and ordered the appeal to be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court, directing the Registry to send the complete record. The order emphasized the need for the lower appellate court to dispose of the matter expeditiously. No substantive merits of the original acquittal were examined.

Issues considered

  • The jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain an appeal under Section 378 CrPC against an acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case.
  • Whether the complainant, as victim, must file the appeal under the proviso of Section 372 CrPC/Section 413 BNSS before the Sessions Court.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Acquittal appealSection 138 NI ActJurisdictionTransfer of appealProviso of Section 372 CrPCSection 413 BNSSSessions Court

Judgment

      R/CR.A/859/2023                                     ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 859 of 2023

==========================================================
                        HARDEVSINH BALBHADRASINH JADEJA
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR P B KHANDHERIA(5228) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
N J JHALA(7374) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR VIRAL V DAVE(3846) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MS ASMITA V PATEL, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 - State
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                 Date : 11/02/2026

                                  ORAL ORDER


1.              This is an acquittal appeal filed under Section 378

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred

to as `the Code’ for short) / under Section 419 of the

Bharatiya         Nagrik      Suraksha         Sanhita,     2023       (hereinafter

referred to as ‘BNSS’ for short) by the complainant against

the judgment and order impugned passed by the learned trial

Court, whereby the learned trial Court had acquitted the

respondent/s/accused of the charge under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as

the `NI Act’ for short).



2.              Heard learned advocate for the parties. Learned

APP     has      submitted      that    this     matter   is   required       to    be

transferred in view of the recent decision of this Court



                                       Page 1 of 3
     R/CR.A/859/2023                                         ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.12753 of 2019 with

Criminal Misc. Application No.12908 of 2019.



3.               Before entering into the merits of this case, this

Court deems it proper to refer to the latest decision rendered

by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s

State      of    Gujarat        &    Anr.       being    Criminal      Miscellaneous
Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on
23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments
of   the        Hon’ble       Supreme          Court,   more     particularly,         the

judgment         in    the     matter     of     M/s    Celestium     Financial        V/s
A.Gyanasekaran               etc.   reported       in   2025    INSC        804,       has

observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint

under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim, has a

specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of the

Code / Section 413 of the BNSS to the Court which is

immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court.

Therefore, the applications for leave to appeal/appeal(s) which

are pending before this Court can be disposed of with a

direction       to     transfer     the    said     application/appeal(s)       to     the

concerned Sessions Court.


4.               In view of the above, learned advocate for the

petitioner requested to transfer the appeal to the concerned

Sessions Court.



                                          Page 2 of 3
         R/CR.A/859/2023                                                              ORDER DATED: 11/02/2026




5.                     In      view         of      the        said        request,            this       appeal           is

disposed of with a direction to the Registry to transfer the

appeal            to        the       concerned               Sessions             Court.           After          it      is

transferred to the concerned Sessions Court, it has to be

treated as an Appeal under the proviso under Section 372 of

the Code / Section 413 of BNSS and numbered accordingly

and issue notice to the parties. The Registry is directed to
transfer the entire record of the case, including the certified

copies of the order impugned and record & proceedings, if

lying with this Court, to the concerned lower Appellate Court,

forthwith.


6.                     Considering that the matter has been pending for

considerable                time,         the       learned            lower          Appellate             Court          is

required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter as
expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that this Court has

not gone into the merits of the matter at this stage.



                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/02/2026 11:23:22




                                                        Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Acquittal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.