GIRISHBHAI JADAVJIBHAI BHANUSHALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The appeal is restored to its original status as the Court is satisfied with the applicant’s reasons for non‑appearance.
Summary
The applicant, Girishbhai Jadavjibhai Bhanushali, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of his criminal appeal which had been dismissed on 30‑04‑2026 because he failed to appear when the matter was called and did not seek a pass‑over. The respondent State of Gujarat opposed the restoration. The applicant’s counsel explained the reasons for his non‑appearance as set out in paragraph 3 of the application. The Court examined the explanation and found the reasons sufficient to justify the failure to appear. Consequently, the Court allowed the restoration application and reinstated the appeal to its original status.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when a criminal appeal is dismissed for non‑appearance without a request for pass‑over?
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.MA/12733/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR RESTORATION) NO. 12733 of
2026
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL/704/2024
==========================================================
GIRISHBHAI JADAVJIBHAI BHANUSHALI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KISHOR PRAJAPATI(2061) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 02/07/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed seeking restoration of
the captioned Criminal Appeal.
2. This Court by an order dated 30.04.2026 had
dismissed the captioned appeal in view of the fact that
none appeared when the matter was called out nor any
request for passover was sought.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated the reasons
at para nos.3 of the application for not remaining
present.
4. Having heard learned advocate for the applicant and
having considered the application, sufficient reasons have
been mentioned in the application for not remaining
present when the matter was called out. In view of the
same, the present application is allowed. The captioned
matter is restored to its original status.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
URIL RANA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/07/2026 15:21:53
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.