MAYURSINH MAHIPATSINH VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

   R/CR.MA/14279/2026                                       ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET)
                              NO. 14279 of 2026
==========================================================
                   MAYURSINH MAHIPATSINH VAGHELA
                                     Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR HARDIK MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                  Date : 06/08/2026
                                      ORDER


[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the
respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for
regular     bail        in   connection    with       FIR    being      C.R.      No.
11213042260086 of 2026 registered with Paddhari Police
Station, Rajkot, for the offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4),
317(5), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 340(2), 342(1), 54 and 61(2) of the
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(d) of the
Information Technology Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely
implicated in the offence. Nothing is required to be recovered or
discovered. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of
the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by
imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State
has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss



                                     Page 1 of 5
   R/CR.MA/14279/2026                             ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




the present application for regular bail on the ground that the
applicant is very much involved in the present offence and
considering the gravity of offence, no case is made out to
entertain present bail application. Therefore, present application
does not deserve consideration.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the
involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction
to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled
principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each
case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration
while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of
accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable
apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the
complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of
securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the
likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and
standing of the accused and the circumstances which are
peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be
considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of
the respective parties and perused the investigation papers.
Following aspects have been considered:

      (1)     Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed;
      (2)     Applicant is behind the bar since 12.02.2026;
      (3)     There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from


                                Page 2 of 5
      R/CR.MA/14279/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




         the     applicant;
         (4)     The prosecution alleges that the applicant was
         working with Rajnikumar Kantilal Angadiya Firm and, at
         the behest of co-accused Bharat, transferred the proceeds
         of the alleged cyber fraud, for which he received a
         commission. It is further alleged that the present applicant
         provided two bank accounts, namely Mahadev Enterprise
         and Surekar Enterprise, both of which were allegedly used
         for routing the proceeds of cyber fraud, and that the
         applicant received a commission in respect thereof. A total
         of 13 NCCRP complaints have been registered in relation
         to these two bank accounts. However, having regard to the
         limited role attributed to the applicant, namely accepting a
         commission        and   facilitating      the   other      accused,        and
         considering that no money trail has been found in his bank
         account, the present application deserves consideration.
         (5)     Prosecution has failed to point out the circumstances
         to continue or prolong his incarceration;
         (6)     Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will
         take its own time.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid
down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra
vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC
40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors
vs.     Public       Prosecutor,   High      Court       of    Andhra        Pradesh
reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial
will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is
nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore,


                                     Page 3 of 5
   R/CR.MA/14279/2026                            ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that
“bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of
personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution
of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering
the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the
FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this
Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the
discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the
present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11213042260086 of 2026 registered with Paddhari Police
Station, Rajkot, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with one surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the
conditions that he/she shall;

  (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
  (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
          prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police
          investigation and shall not to play mischief with the
          evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
  (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a
          week;
  (d)     not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission
          of the Trial Court concerned;
  (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once
          in every month for a period of six months between 11.00



                                Page 4 of 5
      R/CR.MA/14279/2026                                               ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




             a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
      (f)    furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address
             of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to
             the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall
             not change the residence/contact number without
             prior permission of Trial Court;
      (g)    not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned
             trial Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the
             applicant.


[9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the
Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take
appropriate action in the matter.

[10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions,
in accordance with law.

[11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage
made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

[12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct
service is permitted.


                                                                 (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ALI


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ISTAYAK ALI(HC01093), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/08/2026 18:23:21


                                             Page 5 of 5