PRAGYA PRASUN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 59930 April 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, including acid‑attack survivors with facial disfigurements and a blind individual, challenged the mandatory digital KYC/e‑KYC/video‑KYC procedures for being inaccessible and discriminatory. They argued that requirements such as capturing a live photograph and performing a liveness check (e.g., eye‑blin…
KANISHK SINHA & ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 27827 February 2025Dismissed
The appellants, a husband and wife, were charged in two FIRs (2010 and 2011) for offences under the IPC and the IT Act. They contended that the second FIR was based on a complaint under Section 156(3) of the CrPC that was not accompanied by an affidavit, thereby violating the Supreme Court’s direction in Priyanka Sriva…
JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR.versusS. HARISH & ORS.
2024 INSC 71623 September 2024Disposed off
The case arose from an FIR filed in 2020 alleging that the accused, S. Harish, had downloaded and stored child pornographic videos on his mobile phone. The investigation recovered two such videos and a chargesheet was filed under Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and Section 6…
HDFC BANK LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2024 INSC 80722 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Income Tax Department ordered HDFC Bank to stop operation of certain lockers and accounts, but later revoked the order only for the accounts, leading bank officials to mistakenly allow a locker to be operated. The department filed a complaint and an FIR was registered against the bank and its officials for multiple…
APOORVA ARORA & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2024 INSC 22319 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who created and acted in the web‑series “College Romance”, were charged with publishing obscene and sexually explicit material under Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act after a complaint that an episode titled “Happily F****d Up” contained vulgar expletives. The High Court upheld the F…
DR. SOHAIL MALIKversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2025 INSC 141510 December 2025Dismissed
The case involved an IAS officer (the aggrieved woman) who alleged that an IRS officer (the appellant) sexually harassed her at Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. She filed a complaint under the POSH Act before the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of her own department, the Department of Food and Public Distribution. The app…
AKHTAR ALI @ ALI AKHTAR @ SHAMIM @ RAJA USTADversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 109710 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for the rape and murder of a minor girl based on circumstantial evidence, a disputed 'last seen' theory, alleged motive of lust, and DNA forensic reports. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the motive, the reliability of the last seen testimony, and the integrity of the forensic…
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC.versusANI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 6569 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Wikimedia Foundation, as a defendant in a defamation suit filed by ANI Media, appealed a High Court order directing it to delete Wikipedia pages and discussion threads that commented on the court's proceedings, alleging that the order violated its freedom of speech and the sub judice principle. The High Court had h…
SAMIULLAHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 12927 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants challenged the Bihar Registration Rules, 2008 amendments that introduced sub‑rules (xvii) and (xviii) to Rule 19, which made the production of jamabandi or holding‑allotment proof a condition precedent for registering sale or gift documents. The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petitions, holding t…