Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MANDAVIYA BHAVESHBHAI PRAKASHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

The applicant, Mandaviya Bhaveshbhai Prakashbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application. The investigating agency assured compliance with Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Supreme Court’s direction in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. Relying on this assurance, the applicant sought to withdraw the application. The Court, after noting the assurance, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application upon the applicant's request after receiving assurance of compliance with statutory provisions

Legislation cited

Subjects

anticipatory bailwithdrawal of applicationSection 34Arnesh Kumar directioncriminal procedure

Judgment

        R/CR.MA/15520/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 15520
                            of 2026

 ==========================================================
                           MANDAVIYA BHAVESHBHAI PRAKASHBHAI
                                         Versus
                                   STATE OF GUJARAT
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 MR MALAVSINGH N CHAUHAN(10279) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MS BHAVINI N CHAUHAN(10271) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 ==========================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                   Date : 09/07/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER


                        In view of the fair statement made by learned

 APP to the effect that the investigating agency shall strictly

 follow the provisions of Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay

 Sanhita and the direction issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court

 in the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, reported in

 (2014) 8 SCC 273 would be followed in true letter and spirit,
 as now nothing survives in the matter, learned advocate for

 the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application.

 Permission                as      prayed           for       is     granted.             This        application               is

 disposed of as withdrawn.


                                                                                        (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
 SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 15:29:12




                                                           Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "anticipatory bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.