MOHD. TAUSIF @ TAUSIF KOKO S/O. MOHD. RAFIK SHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The application for temporary bail was rejected.
Summary
Mohd. Tausif applied for temporary bail on the ground of his mother's illness. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Chirag M. Mevawala, was absent and a substitute advocate, Ms. J.C. Bhatt, had not filed a vakalatnama. The court noted that the applicant had previously absconded for 8 and 10 days while on temporary release in 2025 and that his jail conduct was poor. The medical certificate annexed to support the bail request was deemed unconvincing. Considering the applicant's conduct, the stale nature of the application, and the lack of justifiable grounds, the court rejected the bail application.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate basis for granting temporary bail when the applicant's conduct in custody has been poor and the supporting medical evidence is insufficient?
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.MA/18228/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 18228
of 2026
==========================================================
MOHD. TAUSIF @ TAUSIF KOKO S/O. MOHD. RAFIK SHA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CHIRAG M MEVAWALA(14159) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 13/08/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This is an application for temporary bail on the
ground of mother’s illness.
2. Earlier, i.e. on 06.08.2026, learned advocate
Ms.J.C. Bhatt has submitted that she has instructions to
appear for and on behalf of the applicant and will file her
vakalatnama in place of learned advocate Mr.Chirag M.
Mevawala. However, the cause list shows that she did not
file her vakalatnama till date.
3. Be that as it may. However, today, when the
matter is called out, neither learned advocate Mr.Mevawala is
present nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt remained present on
behalf of the applicant nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt has
filed her vakalatnama replacing learned advocate
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.MA/18228/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026
Mr.Mevawala for the applicant nor any mention is made for
adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
4. Considering the fact that this application is filed
by the applicant for temporary bail on the ground of his
mother’s illness, however, the matter could not be proceeded
for one reason or the other.
5. Today, learned APP has placed on record the jail
remarks.
6. Considering the jail remarks, it transpires that
the applicant was remained absconded for 08 days and 10
days, respectively, in the year 2025 while he was released
temporarily. Further, his jail conduct is also not good.
7. Moreover, the medical paper annexed to this
application at Annexure-‘C’ (Page-17) does not inspire any
confidence.
8. In view of above, this application needs to be
rejected on the ground of conduct of the applicant, stale
cause and in absence of justifiable grounds/reasons and is
rejected accordingly.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE/83
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/08/2026 17:42:14
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.